This entry was posted on 10/9/2006 10:06 PM and is filed under uncategorized.
Friday night, I went to a birthday party at a swanky Fifth Avenue
apartment (Phil Donahue lives next door). The party was fun, the
champagne was flowing, and the view of the Park was breathtaking.
Sometime during the evening, my friend Leah and I were checking out the
host's bookcase when this guy came over to us and asked us what we were
looking at. I observed that this was clearly a guy's bookshelf,
given all the "President" books (bios of Kennedy, Truman, Nixon
galore). The newcomer asked me what kind of books I liked -
specifically, he asked if I was into literary fiction or chicklit.
Now, I have to admit that the mere question - or the condescending tone
in which it was asked - riled me up right away. But I told myself
that I was reading way too much into the question and just said that I
was much more into novels than nonfiction. At that point, the guy
told us that if that was the case, I had to have James Joyce on my
bookshelf because Ulysses was, without a doubt, the greatest book in
the world. I told him that Joyce was a really popular choice
among men - much more so than among women - and I had a theory about
why this was the case: Joyce, like most men, had a particular
preoccupation with bodily functions. I said this half-jokingly,
but the next thing I knew, the guy had launched into a fifteen minute
lecture about why it was that Ulysses was the greatest book ever
written and if I didn't think so, I clearly didn't get it.
At first, my friend and I were more stunned than anything that someone
was actually lecturing us about Joyce in the middle of a cocktail
party. But as he continued blathering on, we became increasingly
annoyed - especially when he ignored our diplomatic response that we
were all entitled to our own views. Fortunately, my friend
suggested we get some more champagne, and we quickly escaped to the bar
- and from what would no doubt have degenerated into a knockdown,
drag-out fight over Molly Bloom.
Okay, so I know I shouldn't have let this guy bother me, but I couldn't
help it. As it happens, I actually do have Ulysses on my bookshelf (I
was an English major and actually wrote no less three papers on
Joyce). But that doesn't mean that I don't enjoy a good chicklit
novel - obviously, I enjoy chicklit so much that I wrote one
myself. I don't think that reading the classics and chicklit are
mutually exclusive - but apparently, a lot of people do. I think
that's what bothers me most about these anti-chicklit writers out
there. The fact that they're holding themselves out as superior
because they write "serious" fiction smacks not just of intellectual
snobbery - but of insecurity as well. Because if you're truly a
lover of books, you can see the beauty in a book of any genre - even if
it's not part of the Western Canon.
PS: As I was leaving the party, I was waylaid by the Joyce lover.
Apparently, someone had told him I was a writer, and he wanted to know
when my book was coming out so he could read it. Who knows?
Maybe there's hope yet.